Liver Fibrosis Testing Improvements

Image

Don't forget your lipstick

Don’t forget your lipstick

Cirrhosis is a chronic lesion with the accumulation of scar tissue and that alters the structure and function of the liver. Once a patient is cured of Hepatitis C, the danger is not over if the liver is heavily scarred. Currently there is no cure or reversal agent for cirrhosis short of a transplant.

 

 

As cirrhosis progresses, the liver tries to heal itself but the cycle builds scar tissue upon scar tissue and blood cannot flow through the liver. This causes a backup of blood which causes portal hypertension (high blood pressure of the liver). This is incompatible with life. When the liver cannot filter blood, the body compensates by growing vessels around the liver to move blood. And life threatening consequences occur. Frequent results are the pathological creation of blood vessels, ruptured veins in the stomach and esophagus, the inability to stop bleeding, liver cancer, therefore death.

In the past, treatments have targeted blood vessel growth to prevent new weak blood vessels that burst under pressure.

  • Drugs that stop blood vessel growth, do the same thing in the brain and throughout the body so the blocking of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) receptors is damaging to normal blood vessel growth.
  • Most therapies are delivered by blood, but since the liver is scarred, the drugs bypass the liver and sight of inflammation and scar tissue.

Sounds complicated doesn’t it?  Well if you have received treatment for Hepatitis C, you already have a working knowledge of the liver.

Scientists say as the liver attempts to repair itself, the new nodules have high levels of CPEB4 protein and these new nodules form liver cancer cells. CBEP4 has been linked to blood vessel growth in brain and pancreatic cancers. By blocking CBEP4, normal vascular cells grow but the damaged nodules don’t. These experiments have been performed in cells in vitro, animals, and in sample tissue from patients with cirrhosis.

The researchers are working on the role of blocking proteins, and possible treatments for liver carcinomas. Currently liver carcinomas are the main liver cancer and the third deadliest cancer world-wide, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%.

In another study a team at The Salk Institute has identified a molecule, JQ1, which has shown promise in the prevention as well as reversal of liver fibrosis in animals. This molecule interferes with the master regulator of liver fibrosis, BRD4. This treatment is at the gene level, and works to block fibrosis formation for patients with cirrhosis from alcoholism and hepatitis. Currently JQ1 is a prototype of a new class of drugs tested in human clinical trials for various cancers.1,2

 https://heplikeme.wordpress.com/wp-admin/media-upload.php?post_id=1099&type=image&TB_iframe=1

view references

  1. Gastroenterology (2015) doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.038
  2. Scientists in Barcelona discover a potential treatment for cirrhosis. Institute for Research in Biomedicine Barcelona. Published December 11, 2015.

This article is also published in https://hepatitisc.net/living/fibrosis-and-cirrhosis-news/  Please visit  Hepatitis C News  for more topics

So Called Hepatitis C Science Panel on Bias

I read the transcript of a panel discussion regarding Hepatitis C and bias.  The facilitator was a Ph.D. who did not share her area of expertise. My bias is showing here.  Is she knowledgeable about Hepatitis C or bias,  or is she a facilitator for hire?  The panel was a registered nurse, a social worker and a patient, all with Hepatitis C.  Sounds promising.

But the summary of the discussion was this:

  • We need more money from the government to educate people with Hepatitis C about treatments.
  • We need more money from the government so we can support Hepatitis C patients in the same way HIV patients have been supported, with more teams (I am not clear as to what this statement means).
  • The patient’s affirmation was “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me” and “I learned a lot from a support group made of fellow Hepatitis C patients”.

I am with the patient, the tools are within as opposed to without. If solutions tie to outside money or the government, no progress is  made  and we are stuck. But if a new patient begins his journey with only a support group and he feels like shit (which he will), the danger of isolation is there and almost guaranteed.  I suggest adding a couple of strong friends or family members who can take turns helping you ride this bull, to keep you on for the eight seconds  (treatment duration). Forgive my analogy, I am from Texas where that makes sense. Two wonderful people for me were my husband and  the nurse. But, each patient experience is unique.  Keep trying until you find who and what helps you the most.

The pharmaceutical companies are reaching out to the masses.  They are talking about testing new treatments.  The companies are portraying patients as members of society, people who the general population can relate to. Not just the parrot heads and junkies as portrayed in the past.

parrothead BTW, I overheard my first hepatologist refer to Hep C patients in the waiting room as parrot heads (followers of Jimmy Buffett). That was my introduction to the label. I shared my thoughts with him about that descriptor for patients.

The pharmaceutical company  groundswell will reduce the stigma of having Hepatitis C.  Sure the motive is profit. So who cares?  Not a cured person like me (cured makes me sound like a ham). I worked in the pharmaceutical world for a quarter of a century. Research departments, when not linked to marketing, do great work. That is all I need to know. Let the insurance companies fight out the money issues. Give the insurance companies something to focus on other than patients. Oops, my damn bias is showing. I am curious to see how the “Affordable Care Act” (Obama Care) approaches  Hepatitis C.

As the panel patient points out, it is my efforts that will provide my shield from stereotypes. At least until the drug company marketing departments get the job done.

check out http://www.hepatitiscnews.com where I, and other people with Hepatitis C, share information.

HEPATITIS C: THE HAPPY-EVER-AFTER ENDING

Happy Ever After, Mostly

Happy Ever After, Mostly

I witnessed a marker for Hepatitis C yesterday that three years ago was impossible. On CBS, Gilead was advertising treatment/cure for Hepatitis C. Consider that three years ago admission of having Hep C was admission of a dark past, even when none existed. Consider that only 20% Hep C positive people even knew their status. Consider that three years ago treatment success was 40-50% even with forty-eight weeks, multiple drugs that were disabling and exacerbated long-term crippling depression. The latest treatment recommendations for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are now available on www.HCVguidelines.org, the result of a collaboration between the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the International Antiviral Society-USA. These are the few that know what is happening. http://hcvguidelines.org/sites/default/files/AASLD-IDSA_PressRelease.pdf   

Drug development for HCV is progressing rapidly, with new direct-acting antiviral medications capable of essentially curing HCV. Eugene Schiff, MD, director, Schiff Center for Liver Disease at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Florida, commented on the development of the Web site in an interview with Medscape Medical News. “The reason [for the development of the Web site] is that the field is moving so rapidly…the [US Food and Drug Administration] is trying to advance some of these [medications] faster than they have traditionally in the past, which is wonderful for the patients,” Dr. Schiff said. “Because of all this, the average clinician can’t keep up with it, and they’re trying to be more in sync with the advances,” he added. “In just the past 3 months, 2 new medications became available for treating HCV that hold a great deal of promise for patients living with this disease, and more are expected. HCVguidelines.org provides physicians with the latest information and informed guidance on the available treatment options based on a rigorous review of data,” Barbara Murray, MD, president of IDSA, explained in the statement. “[The development of newer drugs is] of historical significance. We are quickly approaching 100% cure rates of this disease with treatment,” Dr. Schiff explained. “The presence of a readily available, frequently updated guidance document is a great service to providers and their patients, who will benefit from modern treatments that result in cure of HCV up to 95% of the time,” Michael Saag, MD, a member of the board of directors of the International Antiviral Society-USA and a cochair of the guidance panel, said in the statement. “The site will be updated regularly to keep pace with improved diagnostic tools and new drug options as they meet [US Food and Drug Administration] approval,” according to the statement. The Web site will include an ongoing summary of recent changes. Guidance for Insurance Carriers.   Also The rapid development of medications has made insurance companies as well as clinicians unsure of the best treatment options

The newer drugs are expensive, and not all insurance carriers are willing to pay for them. The guidelines may help insurance carriers evaluate the appropriateness of these drugs for patients with HCV. As the drugs become more available to patients, the cost may go down, Dr. Schiff said.

Even though the newer drugs are expensive, they may still be cost-effective if they are curing patients, he added.

Guidance for Insurance Carriers Also

The rapid development of medications has made insurance companies as well as clinicians unsure of the best treatment options, the statement explains.

The newer drugs are expensive, and not all insurance carriers are willing to pay for them. The guidelines may help insurance carriers evaluate the appropriateness of these drugs for patients with HCV. As the drugs become more available to patients, the cost may go down, Dr. Schiff said.

Even though the newer drugs are expensive, they may still be cost-effective if they are curing patients, he added.

 

 

Hepatitis C: More Affordable Treatment Possible

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/819086

This attached link presents interesting models for lowering treatment drug costs.  Not necessarily doable, but interesting.  Remember I worked for drug companies for decades.

Thank You Gilead for GS 5885 /  Solvaldi.  Saved my liver!

Good Bye everyone, thanks for your support.

Special thanks to Jana Lee RN and Advanced Liver Therapies.  Time for you to tackle something else like Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or decrease liver transplants rejections; and do something awesome again.

www.HCVguidelines.org  Give this to your physician

http://hcvguidelines.org/sites/default/files/AASLD-IDSA_PressRelease.pdf

http://www.gilead.com/medicines/product-approval-timeline.

 

 

My Teeth? The Least Of My Hepatitis C Problems…

RottenTeeth

Face it, a lot of my peeps with Hepatitis C have bad teeth. If you have a drinking or drug problem, hygiene may be low on the  daily living list.  Yet before treatment for HEP C, the medical team encourages you to catch up all systems.  So, maintenance for eyes, lungs, naughty bits, you get the idea.  I didn’t have big concerns because I was current on all systems, having been clean and sober a quarter of a century.  Treatment HO!

Well, Hep C treatment affected my priorities.  I was so sick.  Daily I was just trying to stay on the planet,  hoping gravity didn’t take a holiday. I didn’t care at all about my grooming, cleanliness, appearance, or anything that healthy people care about.

And my teeth? I have been a nut about dental hygiene since discovering dental floss at age twenty-one. I come from a long line of false teeth people cleaning between teeth with match book covers. Yuck. I never saw a dentist until I was fifteen. Dr. Ache, yes that was his name, removed an important molar (aren’t they all?)

In treatment I tried to keep up dental grooming but sometimes it was days between flossing. Since I rarely ate, it wasn’t a big deal. But, one thing I didn’t consider was that my mouth was always dry even when I drank liquids. So here I am one year after treatment and my dentist is having expensive talks with me about teeth and gum line issues. Not gingivitis, existing dental implants (from lack of pediatric dentistry).

HEPATITIS C AND DRY MOUTH:

Many drugs cause dry mouth including Hep C drugs and antidepressants.  So what?  Saliva is essential for keeping your mouth clean and lubricated.  Saliva contains enzymes that flush away food and odor-causing bacteria.  So what? A dry mouth is a marvelous arena for bad breath, cavities and mouth infections. Symptoms include:

  • Dry mouth (duh)                                           
  • Cracked lips
  • Difficulty swallowing
  • Difficulty eating dry food
  • Altered sense of taste
  • Plaque, decay, gum disease
  • Sores or cracks at corners of mouth
  • Sore throat
  • Oh yes, increased risk of head and neck cancer

Harsh terrain

Remembering to sip water every fifteen minutes was out of the question, so I sucked on sugar-free hard candy and chewed sugar-free gum.  Obviously this didn’t save my oral cavity.  My dentist says I have a geographic tongue.  I will leave that statement alone.

Okay I have created a new entry for your list of “Shit that doesn’t work“.  Now what?

GlaxoSmithKline claims to have the elixir for all your dry mouth angst.  Biotene is a triad of gel, mouthwash and toothpaste.  My dentist gave me a sample of the triple threat. My experience has been short-term relief, maybe that is the best Biotene can do.

BTW, it has been over a year since treatment but I am still on antidepressants and still have a dry mouth.  Dang.

http://www.biotene.com

http://www.nuvorainc.com/salese

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/813283

http://www.hcvadvocate.org/hepatitis/hepC/hepatitis_coordinators.html

The Depression Road Goes On Forever and The Party Never Ends *

Hepatitis C and Depression: I should be weary of this subject, but I’m only weary of depression. Thirteen months ago I completed a clinical trial for Hepatitis C. I was cured, c-u-r-e-d.

 GS-US-256-0124-A Phase 2B, Trial Evaluating Using Combinations of Oral Antivirals (GS-5885, GS-9451), PegInterferon Α and Ribavirin In Treatment Experienced Subjects  With Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Last month I went in for my one-year follow-up visit where it was confirmed “No Virus After One Year!”.  Okay, maybe it’s true.  Maybe. I answered questions about my mental well-being.  I felt great and said so.  Later I remembered that I felt great because I was on two anti-depressant drugs, Lexapro (escitalopram)  and Wellbutrin (bupropion XL) with a splash of trazodone at bedtime.

BTW, I think everyone should speak about their antidepressants. I know there’s a bunch of us out there.  Just look at the sales $$$.     I worked for Lilly when they launched Prozac.  Rather than get it for free, I paid at the retail pharmacy because I didn’t want anyone to know.  That’s Bull Corn.  Bull Corn?  Where did that come from?

Where was I?  So two weeks ago, my psychiatrist,  (who treats Hep C patients) began to decrease the Lexapro with the goal of decreasing my antidepressant load.  My scaffolding crumbled under me and I spiraled into an anxiety-ridden, weeping insomniac in just a few days and nights.

I've come undone
I’ve come undone

.So,  I am miserable and looking at increasing drugs.  My first thought was that I am FUBAR (Fucked Up Beyond All Reason/Recognition/Repair  military slang) and that’s that.  My second thought was to work closely with Dr _ who assures me that this is a minor setback. Minor to someone else maybe. How quickly I become self-absorbed.

Now, after 400 words, the reason for this blog.  Today I received this article from  Medscape.

 Psychiatric Treatment Considerations With Direct Acting Antivirals in Hepatitis C   Sanjeev Sockalingam, Alice Tseng, Pierre Giguere, David Wong
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13(86)

(Newly published articles in my areas of interest for August 9, 2013: Medscape)

Can’t resist the title can you?  I know I can’t.

Being a Doctor of Pharmacy and a scientist, I love articles like this. It takes my entire nineteen years of schooling to follow the data dump. Gastroenterologists and Psychiatrists won’t read this article. It falls into a discrete category that gets filtered out during literature searches. DAAs means previrs ( boceprevir / telaprevir).

Abstract

Background Despite recent advances in hepatitis C (HCV) treatment, specifically the addition of direct acting antivirals (DAAs), pegylated interferon-alpha remains the backbone of HCV therapy. Therefore, the impact of DAAs on the management of co-morbid psychiatric illness and neuropsychiatric sequelae remains an ongoing concern during HCV therapy. This paper provides a review of the neuropsychiatric adverse effects of DAAs and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between DAAs and psychiatric medications.

Methods We conducted a PubMed search using relevant search terms and hand searched reference lists of related review articles. In addition, we searched abstracts for major hepatology conferences and contacted respective pharmaceutical companies for additional studies.

Results Limited data is available on the neuropsychiatric adverse effects of DAAs; however, data from major clinical trials suggest that DAAs have minimal neuropsychiatric risk. DAAs can potentially interact with a variety of psychotropic agents via cytochrome P450 and p-glycoprotein interactions. Triazolam, oral midazolam, St. John’s Wort, carbamazepine and pimozide, are contraindicated with DAAs. DDIs between DAAs and antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, mood stabilizers, antipsychotics and treatments for opioid dependence are summarized.

Conclusions Although DAAs do not add significant neuropsychiatric risk, the potential for DDIs is high. Consideration of DDIs is paramount to improving medication adherence and mitigating adverse effects during HCV therapy.

So the abstract  (I saved you from the entire article)  kinda says: We don’t know enough to draw any conclusions so we caution you when using any drugs metabolized by the liver, including antidepressants. Terms: pharmacokinetics (where the drug goes in your body and how your body changes it to water-soluble (pee), or fat-soluble (poop) to get rid of the drug:  pharmacodynamics , what the drug does to your body to heal you and how it does it. This is for one drug. Think about a bunch of drugs where the liver and maybe kidneys do not work well.  There is a traffic jam and a couple of fights at the entry to your liver and the drugs build up in your blood.   Crash.

This is a year of my life

CPY 450 System, took me years

And so I say to you what any good or bad pharmacist would say:  “Caveat Emptor”.  Actually,  the pharmacist will put warning stickers all over the bottle and give you a packet of small print information.  Then she will make you sign that you have been counseled.

Beware the Jabberwok

Caveat Emptor

* A nod to the awesome Robert Earl Keen Jr. http://www.metrolyrics.com/the-road-goes-on-forever-lyrics-robert-earl-keen.html

http://www.hcvadvocate.org/hepatitis/factsheets_pdf/HCV_Neg.pdf  This is awesome for those like me.

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/807927?src=wnl_edit_tpal&uac=190805DY

Hepatitis C Research: What’s a Phase and How Can We Get through it Faster?

Hepatitis C:  Current Research Drugs

Picture your liver at the center of the Milky Way. Now, the swirling stars are treatments, some closer than others.  Drug studies are in orbit like this.  Work with me here.

Your Liver = Center of your universe.

Illustration of the Milky Way by Dianna Marquee

Illustration of the Milky Way by Dianna Marquee

Filed = Closest stars, drugs waiting on FDA approval.  The red tape wheels grind on.

Phase III = Next out, drugs being tested large-scale for safety and efficacy.  Will the virus die before you do?

Phase II = Further away from your liver, drugs shown not to kill  people when tested on a small group of sick patients. Cohort is the word.  This was me during round two of treatment.  Kind of risky here.

Phase I =  Compounds (drugs) that don’t kill healthy people crazy enough to volunteer (broke students and new parolees)

Preclinical =A blur of solar dust = test tube, computer chemical structuring, animal studies. Yep, animal testing.

When I was first diagnosed in 1991 with Hepatitis C, there was only one binary star, Interferon and Ribavirin.  Finally in 2011  came Telaprevir  and Boceprevir. That’s a long time between hits, 20 years.  Now the Hep C universe is almost getting crowded, but not yet.  The issue is safety and timelines.  The barbaric days of Interferon could be phased out (pun intended).

Phases of  Current Drug Research:  Thanks go to Dr Paul Kwo for this slide

Paul Y. Kwo, MD, is Associate Professor of Medicine and Medical Director of Liver Transplantation in the Gastroenterology/Hepatology Division of Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis

Paul Y. Kwo, MD, is Associate Professor of Medicine and Medical Director of Liver Transplantation in the Gastroenterology/Hepatology Division of Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis

So, this slide represents current studies, phases  and the mechanism of action (MOA).  Remember that we want at least two drugs with different MOAs in our bodies to avoid virus mutation and resistance.  The good news is that there are multiple drug candidates in each category.  For further information on any study, go to www.clinicaltrials.gov and enter the drug/compound name.  This site will also tell you if the study is enrolling patients and if there is a location close to you.  This website rocks.  Thank you federal government.

The US research system is business-based, where competition for the patent drives the process.  I’m not completely opposed to this system.  But it does have drawbacks.

Remember when AIDS researchers were competing to isolate the culprit?  France and the US,  it was crazy.  The two groups still argue about whom was first with what.

The HBO movie And The Band Played On documents government and cultural barriers to a disease connected with a cohort that isn’t mainstream, i.e. HIV and homosexual men.  I’m glad the barriers came down a bit faster with Hep C.  Initially the cohort was alcoholics and drug addicts.  But then the target audience became baby boomers.  This was 1. More acceptable and 2. A bigger pool of patients and potential profit.

Obviously the slide above is the star of this blog.    Drug companies race to be first with a new drug(s).  So why am I speaking of other things?  Because I think the days of working in a research vacuum are limited.  American drug companies say this is bad.  They claim without financial incentive, research will dry up.

But, wouldn’t it be great if companies worked together and combined research efforts?  I know, that is a big but.  I like big buts…There are novel initiatives include partnering between governmental organizations and industry. The world’s largest such initiative is the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), and examples of major national initiatives are Top Institute Pharma in the Netherlands and Biopeople in Denmark.  In the USA it could be the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  We used to joke that NIH meant “Not Investigated Here”  meaning that the USA insists on its own research.  Only science types would joke about such topics. No wonder we have a reputation.

Paul Y. Kwo, MD, is Associate Professor of Medicine

Paul Y. Kwo, MD, is Associate Professor of Medicine

Now picture these studies sharing data.  Think of all the time and patient suffering saved by quickly identifying drug-drug and drug-disease interactions.  Think about how the winners would rise to the top.  I don’t care about the political/social overtones.  I am just thinking about patients. This is already happening with cancer research.

I have worked on this blog for a week and still can’t get it right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus

http://www.chronicliverdisease.org/COEE/index.cfm?id=PKwo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_development

http://voices.yahoo.com/a-summary-film-band-played-on-127287.html

Things Not To Say to Someone Who Just Completed Hepatitis C Treatment

Now What?

Now What?

  • You were in treatment?  I just thought you were aging badly.
  • Now make sure you don’t get it again (my personal favorite)
  • How do you celebrate without alcohol?
  • How can you be sure you are cured? I’ve heard it comes back.
  • I heard of a guy that went two years then his liver blew up.
  • Some guy finished treatment then killed himself.
  • Can you talk to my husband?  He won’t quit drinking and drugging.
  • I saw a website that says St John’s Wort works better.
  • Want to volunteer at the hospice?
  • Too bad you have to give up your handicap placard.
  • Glad you finished.  Maybe you won’t be such a moody A Hole now.
  • You should have waited for newer treatments.  They are better.
  • Now, shut up about your symptoms.
  • Good, now get off your butt and do something.
  • Now what?